By Zachary Fields, Senior Correspondent
A former U.S. Coast Guard lieutenant has been arrested for allegedly threatening the life of former President Donald Trump. Peter Stinson, 55, who served in the Coast Guard from 1988 until his retirement in 2021, reportedly made disturbing online posts across several social media platforms, voicing violent intentions toward the former president. Authorities say Stinson’s posts, which included references to firearms, poisoning, and knives, escalated to suggest a plan to assassinate Trump.
Threats Across Social Media
Stinson’s disturbing messages first came to light after a series of graphic posts surfaced on various online platforms. These posts contained violent imagery and rhetoric, including threats to harm Trump with firearms, poisoning, and knives. One particularly concerning post referred to “Luigied,” a term believed to be an allusion to a murder case involving Luigi Mangione, a man accused of high-profile killings. The post seemed to imply that Stinson harbored similar violent intentions toward the former president.
Despite expressing doubts about his own ability to carry out an assassination, Stinson contradicted himself by continuing to make threatening statements. According to authorities, Stinson appeared to view violence as a necessary tool for his political goals. His posts frequently referenced Antifa, a left-wing anti-fascist political movement, which he claimed to be a part of. In one post, Stinson declared: “This is war. Sides will be drawn. Antifa always wins in the end. Violence is inherently necessary.”
Final Posts and Arrest
Stinson’s final post, made on June 11, further fueled concerns. In a chilling message, he expressed a disturbing sense of anticipation regarding Trump’s death, implying that he would celebrate the former president’s demise. The post’s tone was ominous, with Stinson appearing to openly rejoice at the idea of Trump’s passing.
Federal investigators moved quickly after discovering the posts. On June 13, Stinson was arrested and charged with making threats against the president, a federal offense that carries serious penalties. He is set to appear in federal court in the coming weeks, where the charges will be formally presented.
Authorities have yet to comment on whether Stinson had any direct plans to execute these threats, but they are taking no chances, given the seriousness of the online statements and the potential for further violence.
Antifa Allegiance and Radical Rhetoric
Stinson’s online rhetoric indicates that he might have been motivated by far-left, anti-government ideologies. Although Antifa is not a centralized organization, it is known for its radical left-wing stance, often advocating for resistance to fascism and, in some cases, promoting direct action through violence. The movement has been the subject of significant controversy and media attention, particularly after several high-profile protests and confrontations involving its members.
While Stinson’s specific ties to Antifa remain unclear, the content of his social media posts strongly suggests alignment with some of the movement’s more extreme elements. His statements, especially his claim that “violence is inherently necessary,” raise alarm bells about the potential for further radicalization and extremism.
A Disturbing Pattern of Online Threats
The case also brings to light the broader issue of online threats against public figures, especially politicians. While Stinson’s comments are particularly shocking given his background in the military, it is not the first time that public figures have faced similar threats through social media. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies have been working to track down and arrest individuals making threats online, as the anonymity of the internet often emboldens people to express violent or hateful rhetoric.
Legal Consequences
If convicted, Stinson could face significant legal consequences. Making threats against a sitting or former president is a serious federal offense in the United States, with penalties including long prison sentences. Stinson’s case highlights the dangers posed by radicalized individuals and the growing issue of political violence in America.
The Coast Guard has also distanced itself from Stinson’s actions, emphasizing that his views do not reflect the values or beliefs of the organization. In a statement, the U.S. Coast Guard said: “The U.S. Coast Guard holds all its personnel to the highest standards of conduct. The views and actions expressed by Mr. Stinson are entirely his own, and we strongly condemn any form of violence or threat.”
What’s Next for Stinson?
Stinson’s upcoming court appearance will likely provide more details about his motivations and the extent of his actions. Legal experts suggest that his history of military service may play a significant role in the prosecution’s case, as authorities will need to determine whether his background influenced the severity of his threats. Furthermore, investigators will be scrutinizing his social media history for any other signs of violent intentions or potential accomplices.
For now, the arrest of Peter Stinson serves as a chilling reminder of the increasing prevalence of online threats and the growing divide in American politics. It also underscores the importance of vigilance and swift action when public figures, particularly politicians, are targeted by individuals expressing violent ideologies.
